Is it a lack of artificial intelligence?
Not only is he getting smart, but Duber can also make us.
Scientists found that students who used chatgt to complete essays had weaker cognitive abilities than those who only in their brains, according to a new Dystopian study by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge.
“Supporting its systems can lead to a passive approach and reduce the activation of critical thinking skills when the person later only performance tasks,” the researchers writes with the Telegraph.
The team was set to determine the “cognitive cost” of using large language models (LLM), which have become increasingly comprehensive in every sector of society, including the Academy. According to a winter study by the Pew Research Center, approximately 26% of adolescent students used chatbot to assist them in 2024 – from just 13% to 2023.
To determine how the use of synthetic assistants of homework affects the mind, myth researchers have charged 54 people to write several Sat essays, reported TIME magazine. Participants were divided into three groups: a pure brain-powerful religion, one used by Google, and one-third that recorded the aid of the now-Kudor ChatGpt.
Each person was equipped with an electroencephalography device (EEG) so that researchers can monitor their brain activity while completing their task.
They found that the Chatgpt group “performed worse than their counterparts in the group only in the brain at all levels: nervous, linguistic, marker”, according to the Telegraph.
Readings also showed reduced activity in brain regions related to memory and teaching, the authors said, noting that many of the “thinking and planning” were offered.
In fact, the scholars assisted by him dealt with Dazier with each subsequent letter to the point that up to the third essay, they were simple by pressing quickly in the chatgt and making it do all the work.
“It was more like,” just give me the essay, refine this sentence, modify it and I’m done, “said the main author of the letter, Nataliya Kosmyna.
In contrast, essayists without external help demonstrated the highest levels of nerve connection, especially in the regions of the brain responsible for understanding language, creativity and memory.
The group only with the brain was also more engaged and satisfied with their essays, from the study.
Interestingly, Google Group showed slightly lower levels of engagement, but the same amount of attraction – a perhaps disturbing perspective given the growing number of people who divine in search using it than online search engines.
Researchers revealed that “frequent users of his tools often bypass the deepest engagement with materials, leading to ‘skills atrophy’ to tasks such as brain storm and problem solving.”
This may have long -term branches, including “reduced critical investigation, increase sensitivity to manipulation” and “sedentary creativity,” the authors said.
Fortunately, the findings were not a total story of the one in the Academy.
Scientists asked the Chatgpt group and their counterparts only in the brain to rewrite one of their previous essays —- participants helped by it, did so without chatbot, while the inaccessible group could use the highest technology.
Unless, the original Chatgpt group did not remember much information from their letters, showing either a lack of commitment or inability to remember it.
Meanwhile, the former only brain group exhibited a significant increase in brain activity in all the aforementioned regions despite using the tool.
This suggests if used properly, it can be a useful academic tool than a crutch of recognition change.
The warning of the atrophy of the brain caused by it comes-the scary something-as technology is becoming more “intelligent”.
Recently, Chinese researchers found the first rehearsals that he’s models such as the information of the human mind-like chatgt process, especially when it comes to grouping language.
#Chatgpt #smarter #excessive #destroy #brains #warns #study
Image Source : nypost.com