The Court of Appeal denies Apple’s offer to stop the application store order in a dispute for a year against ‘Fortnite’ Maker

Apple has failed to persuade a US Appeal Court to stop the main parts of the order of a federal judge that requires the iPhone manufacturer to open his profitable app store for more competition immediately.

The 9th District Court of Appeal in the US on Wednesday dismissed Apple’s request to set the provisions as the technology company appeals to the judge’s order, which came to a long antitrust lawsuit filed by the Epic Games of the “Fortnite” creator.

Judge of the US District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in April found Apple in disregard for an earlier order of the order she issued in the Epic Games case.

Apple in a statement said he was “disappointed by the decision not to stay the order of the District Court, and we will continue to argue our case during the Appeal Process”.

The judge on April 30 ordered Apple to complete some practices she said had been created to bypass the order, including a new 27% tax Tax tax on the app when its customers fill out an application outside of the application store.

The court also stopped Apple from restricting when developers establish links to make purchases outside an application.

The founder and chief executive Timants said in a post on X after the Court of Appeal that “Apple’s long national Nightmare has ended”.

In his emergency appeal, Apple said the ruling blocked the company from “exercising control over the essential images of its business operations” and forced him to provide free access to its services.

Epic Games objected that Apple was trying to continue to avoid competition and collect fees the judge had stopped.

Apple has faced an “increase in genuine competition” after the Gonzalez Rogers issued its order in April, after developed applications updated with “better payment methods, better deals and better consumer choices,” Epic said.

EPIC Games The Apple’s Plaints in 2020 to release its control over application transactions using its operating system and how applications are distributed to consumers.

Apple mostly won the issue, but Gonzalez Rogers in 2021 said Apple should allow developers to more easily direct consumers into potentially cheaper non-apps.

Apple challenged that court order to hold a billion -dollar income flow, Gonzalez Rogers wrote in April.

She also said that Apple had deceived the court about her efforts to comply with her order and referred to the company and one of her leaders to federal prosecutors for a possible investigation of criminal contempt.